Vaonis · France
Vaonis Vespera Pro 2
Same optics as the Vespera 3, square 12.5 Mpx sensor with small photosites. Mosaics up to 50 Mpx: together with the Vespera Pro, the highest final resolution of the devices compared here.
At three-quarters on its tripod, optical head tilted
≈ €2,990
List price recorded in 2026, excluding promotions and accessories. It is not an offer. The price offered to you arrives in writing.
This device can be ordered from me. No basket and no online payment: the price, the lead time and availability arrive in writing. I have never had it in my hands. That is written further down this entry, and I am not going to tell you otherwise in order to sell it to you.
The device photographs are the manufacturers' official images. UST is an authorised reseller for all five brands. No image comes from a competing reseller.
not tested In this catalogue: no shots at all. Entry built on public sources.
0 · aucune donnée de première main
0 towards 165h · hours I have logged with this device, this is not a rating
For the image the l'Origin makes in 1h, it takes 4h 58m here.
This equivalence says nothing but speed. It says nothing about resolution, about the field, or about optical quality. f/2,2 on 152 mm and f/4,9 on 50 mm do not photograph the same objects. The calculation takes nothing but the published focal ratios, with sensor, sky and target held identical.
Rapport d'ouverture : the focal length divided by the diameter, written f/, and the smaller that number, the faster the image forms.
- Aperture
- 50 mm
- Focal length
- 245 mm
- Focal ratio
- f/4.9
- Sensor
- Sony IMX676, format 1/1.6 inch, 7.0 × 7.0 mm, 2 µm photosites
- Resolution
- 3,536 × 3,536 px (12.5 Mpx)
- Mount
- Motorised altazimuth
- Weight
- 5 kg
- Software
- Singularity (iOS, Android)
- Indicative price
- ≈ €2,990
Monture azimutale : it moves in altitude and in rotation, but the field turns during the night.
The device
Seen from closer up
The other images published by Vaonis for this device.
Where it excels
What it does well
Fine detail and the mosaic. 2 µm photosites, detail resolution quoted at 1.60 arcseconds per pixel, and 50 Mpx out of the mosaic.
Strong points
- 12.5 Mpx on a square sensor: together with the Vespera Pro, the highest native resolution of the devices compared here.
- Detail resolution quoted at 1.60 arcseconds per pixel, against 2.39 on the Vespera 3.
- 256 GB of raw storage, of which 225 are available, against 128 GB raw on the Vespera 3.
- Five year warranty, where the original Vespera Pro carried two.
- Optical baffling and a Petzval inspired design, both new compared with the Vespera Pro.
- Carbon tripod, rigid carrying case and optical cap for dark frames, listed by the manufacturer on the accessories supplied line.
- Eleven hours of battery and a dew heater fitted as standard.
Weak points
- About €2,990 for 50 mm of aperture: the most expensive in the panel after the Origin.
- The native field is the narrowest in the Vespera range: 1.6° by 1.6°, against 2.5 by 1.4 on the Vespera 3.
- Small 2 µm photosites: Vaonis itself quotes the Vespera 3 as the faster of the two.
- €500 more than the Vespera 3 for the same optics, the same weight and the same battery life.
- The sensor does not change from the Vespera Pro: same IMX676, same resolution, same field, same mosaic.
- No filter in the box: the manufacturer itself writes “none” on the built-in filter line.
- Alt-azimuth mount only: no equatorial mode.
In practice
Starting out, observing, setting up
-
01
The focal ratio printed here is the one Vaonis publishes, f/4.9. The calculation on the published 50 mm and 245 mm lands on it.
-
02
What the 2 changes on the Vespera Pro, line by line in the manufacturer's table: focal length from 250 to 245 mm, ratio from f/5 to f/4.9, optical baffling added and a Petzval inspired design, storage from 225 GB to 256 GB raw of which 225 available, adjustable tripod replaced by a tall carbon tripod, warranty from two to five years.
-
03
What the 2 does not change: the IMX676 sensor, the resolution, the native field, the mosaic, the weight, the battery life and the limiting magnitude. The gap between the two Pros is thinner than the one between the Pro 2 and the Vespera 3.
-
04
The address of the manufacturer's page is written with no hyphen before the 2: /products/vespera-pro2. The address with a hyphen answers 404.
-
05
The light pollution filter, at €169, and the rucksack were included with payment when recorded on 14/09/2026. That is an offer, not the contents of the box.
Images made with this device
No images: it has not been tried
This device has never been used to make one of my images. The photographs above show the device, and they come from the manufacturer. No sky image is borrowed to fill the space. Its entry rests on the published sources, listed further down. Its integration time scale therefore stays at zero.
Temps d'intégration : the total exposure time, the sum of every exposure stacked on an object.
0 images · space left empty
I publish 10 photographs, 2 of which are of equipment. None of them appears on this entry, and that is deliberate: not one of them shows this device, and an image placed there would amount to a claim.
Getting hold of one
Order this Vespera Pro 2
≈ €2,990
Market price recorded in 2026 from the sources cited below. It is not a selling price, and it does not constitute an offer. Your price, your lead time and availability appear in the written reply.
Say what you want to photograph, and from what sky. The answer says whether this device suits. If not, it says which one suits better. Are you looking for a second-hand one, or do you have a device to trade in? Write it in the message. The answer will be straight, including when it is no.
Sources
Where these figures come from
- Vaonis, tableau officiel de comparaison des modèles
- Vaonis, caractéristiques techniques de la nouvelle génération Vespera
- Vaonis, fiche Vespera Pro 2
The prices are indicative and recorded in 2026. A specification wrong or out of date? Report it. The field of view and the sampling are not published here. The physical size of the sensor is not part of the project's sourced data, and those two values cannot be estimated.